Pope Leo says ‘no one possesses the whole truth’ in Sunday sermon

[Stone]

The Synodal Séance: When Truth Becomes a Group Project
Leo XIV’s Jubilee homily claimed “no one possesses the whole truth.” This analysis shows how that defies the Church’s divine order.

Chris Jackson via Hiraeth in Exile | Oct 28, 2025

The candles are lit, the circle is drawn, and the voices begin to murmur. Not at a séance table, but in St. Peter’s Basilica.

In his Jubilee homily for “Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies,” Leo XIV summoned a vision of the Church as a spiritual workshop where no one possesses the truth, but everyone contributes a fragment of it. He called it humility. Tradition calls it apostasy.

The spectacle was billed as a “Jubilee of Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies.” That title alone sounds less like the Mystical Body of Christ and more like a committee of revelation by consensus: a Church that no longer teaches, but takes minutes. Beneath the perfumed language of love, service, and fraternity, the message was unmistakable: the Church is no longer a divinely structured hierarchy of truth, but a collective experiment in dialogue.

“No One Possesses the Whole Truth”: The New Creed of Uncertainty

The most startling line came early: “No one possesses the whole truth; we must all humbly seek it and seek it together.”

What followed was an invitation to perpetual uncertainty; the kind of communal truth-seeking once condemned as the signature of Modernism. If no one possesses the whole truth, then what exactly does the Church exist for? What becomes of her ancient claim to be “the pillar and ground of truth” (1 Tim 3:15)?

For nearly two millennia, Catholics believed the Church does possess the truth; not in part, but in fullness, because her Founder entrusted it to her. Christ promised the Spirit of Truth would “abide with you forever.” The pre-Vatican II popes never described the Church as “seeking” truth. They described her as guarding it, teaching it, and judging error against it.

Leo XIV’s statement, by contrast, collapses the distinction between the Church and the world. If truth must be “sought together,” then the Church is merely one seeker among many; no longer the teacher, only a participant. That is not Catholic ecclesiology, but the theology of perpetual dialogue.

Pope Pius XI, in Mortalium Animos (1928), condemned precisely this idea: that unity could be achieved by Christians “meeting together in search of the truth,” as if no one possessed it. The only path to unity, he said, was the return of the erring to the one true Church, which does possess the entire deposit of faith. The irony is rich: Leo XIV now repeats, almost verbatim, the very error his predecessors anathematized.

Even the First Vatican Council foresaw and forbade this drift. Pastor Aeternus solemnly defined that the Holy Spirit was not promised to Peter’s successors so they might discover new doctrines, but that they might guard faithfully the revelation already given. Leo’s “synodal humility” thus becomes the inverse of papal duty. The Pope who claims not to possess the truth disqualifies himself from speaking it.

This is not humility, but dereliction. Either the Church possesses divine truth or she does not. If she does, there is no need to seek it; if she does not, she is no longer the Church. The phrase “no one possesses the whole truth” sounds gentle, but it amounts to the same proposition condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi: that truth evolves through communal experience rather than descending once for all from revelation.


Synodal Teams and the New Ecclesial Democracy

If the Church no longer teaches, she must consult. Enter the “Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies.”

Leo XIV hailed these bureaucratic constructs as “an image of a Church that lives in communion.” They are to embody a new way of “being Church”: horizontal, inclusive, and “listening.” Leo contrasted their “logic of love” with what he called the “worldly logic of power.” No one should impose ideas; all must listen. The Church, he declared, “expands the ecclesial space so that it becomes collegial and welcoming.”

The shift is not cosmetic, but constitutional. The Church of councils and definitions becomes the Church of circles and conversations.

Pre-conciliar theology taught that the Church is a hierarchical society: a visible structure with divinely conferred authority. As Pope St. Pius X wrote in Vehementer Nos:

“…the Church is essentially an unequal society… comprising two orders of persons: the Pastors and the flock…the one duty of the multitude is to allow themselves to be led, and, like a docile flock, to follow the Pastors.”

That was not arrogance but obedience to divine institution. Christ Himself established this order when He said to Peter, “Feed my sheep.” The hierarchy was never a human invention; it was the supernatural skeleton of the Mystical Body.

Leo XIV’s “participatory Church,” by contrast, reverses that order. He imagines authority that emerges from below rather than descending from above. The Church of listening sessions and committees is not the Bride of Christ but a religious parliament, where the Holy Ghost is reduced to the mood of the room.

In this vision, bishops no longer command but facilitate; the Pope no longer defines but moderates; and doctrine becomes a negotiated consensus rather than a revealed deposit. It is governance by séance: each voice invoking its own spirit, hoping the Spirit capital-S will hover over the assembly and nod.

But the Church is not a séance. She does not conjure truth; she proclaims it. She does not “journey together” to discover God; she leads the world to Him.


The Theology of Perpetual Tension

Leo XIV insists the Church must live “amid the tensions between unity and diversity, tradition and novelty, authority and participation.” These tensions, he says, should not be resolved but “harmonized by the Spirit.” That phrase perfectly summarizes the post-conciliar religion: harmony without resolution, unity without truth.

The old Church resolved tension by clarifying doctrine. The new Church prolongs tension as proof of vitality. “Journeying together” has replaced arriving anywhere.

This explains why the same hierarchy that preaches “inclusion” excludes the faithful attached to the traditional Latin Mass. The same Pope who warns against Pharisaical pride routinely casts traditional Catholics as the Pharisees of his parables. His “walking together” seems to exclude anyone unwilling to walk in circles.

Underneath all the synodal verbiage lies a moral inversion. Certainty is pride; doubt is humility. Teaching is domineering; listening is sanctity. Dogma is rigidity; confusion is pastoral sensitivity. The modern shepherd will not say where the path leads, only that we must keep walking.


Tradition vs. Synodality: Two Churches

When Leo XIV tells the faithful that truth must be “sought together,” he speaks not as a successor of Peter but as a disciple of the Council that tried to reinvent him. The traditional Church believes revelation is fixed, public, and complete; the synodal Church treats it as open-ended, communal, and incomplete.

In the first, unity flows from truth. In the second, truth is sacrificed to unity.

The Catholic Church of all ages believed her divine constitution immutable. The “synodal Church,” in exalting participation and dialogue, has effectively rewritten that constitution. It is not the mystical continuation of Christ’s Body but a modern experiment in ecclesial democracy: a Church of sociology, not theology.

To the faithful who remember what the papacy once meant, Leo’s words ring as hollow as his processions are loud. The Pope who tells us no one possesses the truth has, in effect, renounced the authority that defined his office. The result is precisely what St. Paul warned against: “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”


The Séance Ends

The candles will burn out. The murmurs will fade. But the spirit they have summoned, the restless spirit of synodality, will not leave the room easily.

A Church that forgets she has the truth becomes a Church that cannot preach it. A hierarchy that refuses to impose doctrine will soon find itself imposed upon by the world. The bishops who “listen to all voices” will eventually obey the loudest.

Better a triumphant Church that proclaims divine truth with certainty than a trembling Church that whispers it might not possess any at all.

In the end, the “Synodal Séance” is not merely a metaphor. It is a diagnosis: a Church trying to resurrect herself by calling on every spirit except the Holy One.