U.S. Bioethics Chief, Who Happens to be Fauci’s Wife, Published a New Paper Telling Corporates They Can Ethically ‘Pressure Employees’ And ‘Embarrass Vaccine Resistors.’
The paper comes hot on the heels of a number of White House losses regarding federal worker vaccination and mask mandates.

Quote:While employment-based vaccine encouragement may raise privacy and autonomy concerns, and though some employers might hesitate to encourage employees to get vaccinated, our analysis suggests ethically acceptable ways to inform, encourage, strongly encourage, incentivize, and even subtly pressure employees to get vaccinated.

Quote:“Despite worries about a perception of unfairness, we argue that the selective easing of public health restrictions is ethically appropriate when done transparently and tied to objective public health guidance.”

NB: The following interview is 'littered' with Vatican II errors. Just littered. Once again we see that everything that the Conciliar popes and their administrators do or say comes directly from Vatican II. Vatican II is the source and justification of every word and action.

And these are not small errors that are being consistently promoted these last sixty years. :

Quote:“The more one analyzes the documents of Vatican II, and the more one analyzes their interpretation by the authorities of the Church, the more one realizes that what is at stake is not merely superficial errors, a few mistakes, Ecumenism, Religious Liberty, Collegiality, a certain Liberalism, but rather a wholesale perversion of the mind, a whole new philosophy based on modern philosophy, on subjectivism… A wholly different version of Revelation, of Faith, of philosophy! Very grave! A total perversion! ...  So, they are no small errors. We are not dealing in trifles. We are into a line of philosophical thinking that goes back to Kant, Descartes, the whole line of modern philosophers who paved the way for the Revolution.” (Two Years After the Consecrations, September 6, 1990)

Archbishop Arthur Roche: "Soon a document on the liturgical formation of all the baptized"

From gloria.tv [adapted - emphasis mine]:

Sorrowful Heart of Mary SSPX-MC

View as Webpage

[Download PDF here.]

✠

• the collegial authority of the Pope and the bishops (i.e. a “two-headed Church” by collegiality!);
  
• the authority of the present “magisterium” and the “Conciliar Church” with all their errors;
  
• the “progress” of Tradition according to the neo-modernists;
  
• the criteria for interpreting between Tradition and the texts of Vatican II, in general, i.e. the “hermeneutics of continuity” of Pope Benedict XVI; the “hermeneutics of continuity” used as the criteria for interpreting between Tradition and Vatican II, on Ecumenism and Religious Liberty;
  
• postponing the doctrinal discussions until later;
  
• accepting the “validity” and “legitimacy” of the New Mass and sacraments; and
  
• acceptance of the New Code of Canon Law (1983) with no distinctions.
  

• "So what are we supposed to think about this? Well, it’s that this [New] Canon Law is unacceptable.”  (Spiritual Conference given at Écône, 99B, March 14, 1983).
  

• “The New Code no longer asks a married Protestant / Catholic couple to sign a commitment to baptize the children Catholic. It is a serious violation of the Faith, a serious violation of the Faith!... In the New Code of Canon Law there are two supreme powers of the Church: there is the power of the Pope, who has the supreme power, and then the Pope with the bishops...that has never been seen in the Church...it is thus to limit the power of the Pope. So, the explanatory note [nota praevia] of the Council, practically, has no effect under the New Canon Law.” (Spiritual Conference given at Écône, 100A, May 20, 1983).
  

• “The Apostolic Constitution introducing the New Canon Law explicitly says on page 11 of the Vatican Edition: ‘The work, namely the Code, is in perfect accord with the nature of the Church, especially as been proposed by the Second Vatican Council. Moreover, this New Code can be conceived as an effort to expose this doctrine, i.e., Conciliar Ecclesiology, in canonical language.’ ...It is the authority of the Pope and the Bishops that is going to suffer; the distinction between the clergy and the laity will also diminish; the absolute and necessary character of the Catholic Faith will also be extenuated to the profit of heresy and schism; and the fundamental realities of sin and grace will be worn down.” (Letter to Friends & Benefactors, no. 24, March 1983).
  

• “However, when one reads this New Code of Canon Law one discovers an entirely new concept of the Church...This is the definition of the Church (New Code canon 204): ‘The faithful are those who, inasmuch as they are incorporated into Christ by baptism are constituted as the people of God, and who for this reason, having been made partakers in their manner in the priestly, prophetic and royal functions of Christ, are called to exercise the mission that God entrusted to the Church to accomplish in the world.’...There is no longer any clergy. What, then, happens to the clergy?...It is consequently easy to understand that this is the ruin of the priesthood and the laicization of the Church!...This is precisely what Luther and the Protestants did, laicizing the priesthood. It is consequently very grave...you know that the New Code of Canon Law [Canon 844] permits a priest to give Communion to a Protestant . It is what they call ‘Eucharistic hospitality.’ These are [given to] Protestants who remain Protestant and do not convert! This is directly opposed to the Faith!” (Conference at Turin, Italy March 24, 1984).
  

• “We find this doctrine already suggested in the Council document Lumen Gentium, according to which, the college of Bishops, together with the Pope, exercise supreme power in the Church in a habitual and constant manner. This is not a change for the better; this doctrine of double supremacy is contrary to the teaching and Magisterium of the Church. It is contrary to the definitions of Vatican Council I and to Pope Leo XIII’s Encyclical Satis Cognitum.” (Open Letter to Confused Catholics, Angelus Press, 1985, ch.13, p.95).
  

• “Our cry of alarm was rendered more urgent by the errors in the New Code of Canon Law, not to say its heresies...” (Open Letter to Confused Catholics, Angelus Press, 1985, ch. 21, p. 150).
  

• a Protestant concept of the Church defined now as “the People of God”;
  
• two supreme universal powers in the Church (Christ established a monarchical
  
• structure for His Church, not democratic);
  
• the error of Collegiality at all levels;
  
• a laicization of the Church (i.e. more and more “active participation” of the laity);
  
• Ecumenical practices, such as giving Holy Communion to heretics, called
  
• “Eucharistic hospitality.”
  
• new causes for nullity of marriages;
  
• easy granting of annulments in Marriage Tribunals;
  
• new regulations in contracting marriages;
  
• suppression of the Major Order of Subdiaconate, minor orders (Porter, Lector,
  
• Exorcist and Acolyte) and tonsure;
  
• new “canonizations”;
  
• relaxing of disciplinary laws;
  
• etc., etc.