| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 668 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 663 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Susannah
|
| Latest Threads |
Holy Mass in New Hampshir...
Forum: November 2025
Last Post: Stone
1 hour ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3
|
Fr. Hewko Catechism: Conf...
Forum: Catechisms
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 01:19 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 72
|
Oratory Conference: St. C...
Forum: Conferences
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 01:15 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 44
|
Fr. Hewko: Work of St. Jo...
Forum: November 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 01:08 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 37
|
Dr. Carol Byrne: A Series...
Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 12:54 PM
» Replies: 155
» Views: 520,866
|
The Way Of Perfection by ...
Forum: Resources Online
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 12:08 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 839
|
Bulletin of the Oratory o...
Forum: Bulletin of the Oratory of the Sorrowful Heart of Mary
Last Post: Stone
11-11-2025, 03:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 101
|
Fr. Chenu Deliberately pu...
Forum: The Architects of Vatican II
Last Post: Stone
11-11-2025, 12:54 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 96
|
Vatican II Institutionali...
Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
Last Post: Stone
11-11-2025, 11:56 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 79
|
Fr. Ruiz Sermons: 2025 1...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons November 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
11-10-2025, 07:38 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 114
|
|
|
| Rome’s Latin Mass Concessions Come With Conditions |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-23-2025, 08:28 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Rome’s Latin Mass Concessions Come With Conditions
From Cleveland to the Sistine Chapel, mercy is granted only to those who first confess Vatican II.
Chris Jackson via Hiraeth in Exile [slightly adapted] | Oct 22, 2025
It’s a familiar pattern by now: every “concession” from Rome arrives with a leash attached. Every word of compassion conceals a doctrinal condition. Every token nod toward tradition serves to remind you who is boss. This week’s Vatican stories form a single portrait of the post-conciliar Church: a faith administered on parole, a mercy that demands ideological compliance, and a gospel repackaged as therapy.
The Latin Mass on Parole
The headlines sounded merciful: “Vatican grants two-year extension for Latin Mass in Cleveland.”
The faithful in Akron and Cleveland exhaled, grateful that the Mass of their forefathers had not been stamped out entirely. Yet the truth came, as it always does, not from Rome but from a parish email leaked to social media.
The bishop, it turns out, had asked for five years. He was granted two—and only on the condition that the clergy “lead the faithful attached to the anterior ritual form towards full appreciation and acceptance of the liturgical books renewed by decree of the Second Vatican Council.” The Vatican even recommended that one of the traditional Masses be replaced by a Novus Ordo in Latin.
So the “extension” is really an ultimatum: learn to love Vatican II or lose your Mass. The faithful are allowed to kneel only long enough to be re-educated. The Old Rite survives, not as a legitimate expression of the Roman faith, but as a behavioral-correction program. This is not mercy; it’s management. It’s the same technique used with every dissenting remnant: appease, isolate, retrain, and eventually dissolve.
The post-conciliar Church never simply forbids; it “accompanies” you until you stop resisting.
Green Ecumenism in the Sistine Chapel
While Cleveland’s faithful are told to rediscover their enthusiasm for Vatican II, the head of that same conciliar Church prepares to host an ecumenical “prayer for the care of Creation” in the Sistine Chapel. King Charles III will join him under the slogan of “ecological conversion.”
Archbishop Viganò captured it succinctly: two “supreme authorities” of their respective modern churches, united not by faith in Christ but by the “environmentalist and neo-Malthusian ideology of the World Economic Forum.”
Leo will reportedly gift Charles a seat inscribed Ut unum sint—“that they may be one.” But one in what? Certainly not in the Catholic faith once defended by the martyrs whom Henry VIII butchered. The unity on display is the new conciliar unity: emotional, horizontal, and completely un-evangelical.
It is the Church of atmospheric fellowship, where conversion is environmental and salvation means sustainability. The Sistine Chapel becomes a kind of interfaith greenhouse: Michelangelo’s Last Judgment presiding over a climate summit.
Mercy for the Planet, Silence for the Martyrs
While the Vatican choreographs its ecological pageant, the Secretary of State assures the world that the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria “is not a religious conflict.” Cardinal Parolin, ever the diplomat, explains that the violence is “a social one,” the result of “disputes between herders and farmers.”
But the facts defy him.
Between January 2023 and December 2024, Nigeria suffered a surge in religiously motivated violence, particularly in the North and Middle Belt. Armed groups like Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) led coordinated assaults on churches, villages, and clergy. In Plateau and Benue States alone, thousands were displaced and hundreds killed, including over 1,100 Christians, among them twenty priests, within a single month after the 2023 presidential inauguration. During Christmas 2023, joint attacks by local and foreign militants left nearly 300 dead; by June 2025, another 200 displaced Christians were massacred in Benue.
(Parolin’s “herders”above)
Church leaders describe the campaign as deliberate, a jihadist strategy to expel Christian populations. Radicalized Fulani herdsmen, aided by Islamist militias, continue systematic attacks and land seizures. Even Catholic schools have been assaulted, such as the 2024 attack on a Christian high school in Makurdi, where blasphemy accusations and witchcraft-related killings inflamed the violence. Dozens of clergy have been kidnapped or murdered, while regional hisbah police enforce Sharia restrictions in northern states, defying constitutional law.
Yet Parolin tells us this is about “social tensions.” The same Vatican that can detect “microaggressions” against the environment cannot recognize a genocide against its own flock. When the blood of martyrs cries from the ground, Rome hears only the “cry of the earth.”
Universities Without Faith
From diplomacy to academia, the same decay spreads. Georgetown University, once the proud flagship of Catholic scholarship, has chosen a new president who publicly rejects the Church’s teaching on homosexuality.
Eduardo Peñalver announced years ago that he “takes inspiration” from “committed gay couples” and believes the Church “erred” in her moral teaching. That alone should have disqualified him. Instead, it qualified him.
The Jesuits call him “an exceptional leader steeped in the Catholic and Jesuit tradition.” And indeed he is, if that “tradition” means perpetual dissent disguised as dialogue. The universities that were meant to defend the faith now produce administrators who deny it with a smile. Their theology departments churn out relativism as readily as their cafeterias serve fair-trade coffee.
Once the faith leaves the sanctuary, the classroom quickly forgets it ever existed.
The Synodal Mood of Rome
Leo’s own addresses this week were minor variations on the same theme. Speaking to the Portuguese College, he praised the “polyphony of unity” and “listening to what the Spirit inspires in each believer.” The words sound harmless, even poetic. Yet beneath the glow lies the same synodal anthropology: revelation as conversation, truth as tone, the Church as a focus group for the Holy Spirit.
But the deeper signal came in his General Audience on the Resurrection.
The Therapeutic Resurrection
(The grotesque, distorted, sculpture of the Resurrection in Paul VI Audience Hall)
“The resurrection of Jesus Christ,” Leo began, “can heal one of the malaises of our time: sadness.” What follows is not apostolic preaching but cognitive-behavioral therapy. Christ’s victory over death becomes a “gentle reminder when the going gets tough.” The two disciples of Emmaus are not witnesses to divine revelation but patients learning perspective.
The Resurrection, in his telling, is no longer the cosmic reversal of sin and death, it’s the emotional recovery of disappointed men. It “changes our outlook,” he says, “filling the void of sadness.” Gone are the thunderclaps of Easter morning, the stone rolled away by angelic power. Gone the triumph over Satan, the promise of our own glorified bodies. What remains is a moral of resilience.
Where Scripture proclaims “If Christ be not risen, your faith is vain,” Leo offers something closer to “If Christ be not risen, you might feel sad—but take heart.” The event that once shattered the pagan world is rewritten as a mood enhancer, a wellness narrative for the spiritually fatigued.
This is the last mutation of Vatican II religion: revelation reduced to therapy, miracle to metaphor, resurrection to reassurance. A Church that once declared “He is risen indeed” now whispers, “He will make you feel better.”
Conclusion: The Faith That Comes With Conditions
Across these stories, Cleveland, the Sistine Chapel, Nigeria, Georgetown, Rome itself, the pattern repeats. Every grace is conditional, every truth emotional, every miracle interpretive. The Mass is extended only if it promotes Vatican II; unity is celebrated only if it ignores doctrine; persecution is acknowledged only if it’s not too religious; and the Resurrection is preached only if it comforts rather than converts.
A faith so managed cannot convert the world because it no longer believes the world needs converting. The shepherds have become therapists, and the Gospel, a group session. But the empty tomb still waits outside their window, unmanageable, untamed, and gloriously true.
|
|
|
| The Sermons of St. John Vianney |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-22-2025, 01:17 PM - Forum: Resources Online
- Replies (7)
|
 |
THE SERMONS OF SAINT JOHN MARY VIANNEY NO.1
Taken from here.
THE DREADFUL STATE OF THE LUKEWARM SOUL
In speaking to you today, my dear brethren, of the dreadful state of the lukewarm soul, my purpose is not to paint for you a terrifying and despairing picture of the soul which is living in mortal sin without even having the wish to escape from this condition. That poor unfortunate creature can but look forward to the wrath of God in the next life. Alas! These sinners hear me; they know well of whom I am speaking at this very moment. . . . We will go no further, for all that I would wish to say would serve only to harden them more. In speaking to you, my brethren, of the lukewarm soul, I do not wish, either, to speak of those who make neither their Easter duty nor their annual Confession.
They know very well that in spite of all their prayers and their other good works they will be lost. Let us leave them in their blindness, since they want to remain that way . . . .
Nor do I understand, brethren, by the lukewarm soul, that soul who would like to be worldly without ceasing to be a child of God. You will see such a one at one moment prostrate before God, his Saviour and his Master, and the next moment similarly prostrate before the world, his idol.
Poor blind creature, who gives one hand to God and the other to the world, so that he can call both to his aid, and promise his heart to each in turn! He loves God, or rather, he would like to love Him, but he would also like to please the world. Then, weary of wanting to give his allegiance to both, he ends by giving it to the world alone. This is an extraordinary life and one which offers so strange a spectacle that it is hard to persuade oneself that it could be the life of one and the same person. I am going to show you this so clearly that perhaps many among you will be hurt by it. But that will matter little to me, for I am always going to tell you what I ought to tell you, and then you will do what you wish about it . . . .
I would say further, my brethren, that whoever wants to please both the world and God leads one of the most unhappy of lives. You shall see how. Here is someone who gives himself up to the pleasures of the world or develops some evil habit.
How great is his fear when he comes to fulfil his religious duties; that is, when he says his prayers, when he goes to Confession, or wants to go to Holy Communion! He does not want to be seen by those with whom he has been dancing and passing nights at the cabarets, where he has been giving himself over to many kinds of licentiousness. Has he come to the stage when he is going to deceive his confessor by hiding the worst of his actions and thus obtain permission to go to Holy Communion, or rather, to commit a sacrilege? He would prefer to go to Holy Communion before or after Mass, that is to say, when there is no one present. Yet he is quite happy to be seen by the good people who know nothing about his evil life and among whom he would like to arouse good opinions about himself. In front of devout people he talks about religion. When he is with those who have no religion, he will talk only about the pleasures of the world. He would blush to fulfil his religious practices in front of his companions or those boys and girls who share his evil ways . . . .
This is so true that one day someone asked me to allow him to go to Holy Communion in the sacristy so that no one would see him. Is it possible, my brethren, that one could think upon such horrible behaviour without shuddering?
But we shall proceed further and you will see the embarrassment of these poor people who want to follow the world without-outwardly at any rate-leaving God. Here is Easter approaching. They must go to Confession. It is not, of course, that they want to go or that they feel any urge or need to receive the Sacrament of Penance. They would be only too pleased if Easter came around about once every thirty years. But their parents still retain the exterior practice of religion. They will be happy if their children go to the altar, and they keep urging them, then, to go to Confession. In this, of course, they make a mistake. If only they would just pray for them and not torment them into committing sacrileges. So to rid themselves of the importunity of their parents, to keep up appearances, these people will get together to find out who is the best confessor to try for absolution for the first or second time
'Look, says one, 'my parents keep nagging at me because I haven't been to Confession. Where shall we go? 'It is of no use going to our parish priest; he is too scrupulous. He would not allow us to make our Easter duty. We will have to try to find So-and-So. He let this one and that one go through, and they are worse than we are. We have done no more harm than they have.
Another will say: 'I assure you that if it were not for my parents I would not make my Easter duty at all. Our catechism says that to make a good Confession we must give up sin and the occasions of sin, and we are doing neither the one nor the other. I tell you sincerely that I am really embarrassed every time Easter comes around. I will be glad when the time comes for me to settle down and to cease gallivanting. I will make a confession then of my whole life, to put right the ones I am making now. Without that I would not die happy.
'Well, another will say to him, 'when that time comes you ought to go to the priest who has been hearing your confessions up to the present. He will know you best. 'Indeed no! I will go to the one who would not give me absolution, because he would not want to see me damned either.
'My word, aren't you good! That means nothing at all. They all have the same power.
'That is a good thing to remember when we are doing what we ought to do. But when we are in sin, we think otherwise.
One day I went to see a girl who was pretty careless. She told me that she was not going back to Confession to the priests who were so easy and who, in making it seem as if they wanted to save you, pushed you into Hell. That is how many of these poor blind people behave! 'Father, they will say to the priest, 'I am going to Confession to you because our parish priest is too exacting. He wants to make us promise things which we cannot hold to. He would have us all saints, and that is not possible in the world. He would want us never to go to dances, nor to frequent cabarets or amusements. If someone has a bad habit, he will not give Absolution until the habit has been given up completely. If we had to do all that we should never make our Easter duty at all. My parents, who are very religious, are always after me to make my Easter duty. I will do all I can. But no one can say that he will never return to these amusements, since he never knows when he is going to encounter them.
'Ah! says the confessor, quite deceived by this sincere sounding talk, 'I think your parish priest is perhaps a little exacting. Make your act of contrition, and I will give you Absolution. Try to be good now.
That is to say: Bow your head; you are going to trample in the adorable Blood of Jesus Christ; you are going to sell your God like Judas sold Him to His executioners, and tomorrow you will go to Holy Communion, where you will proceed to crucify Him. What horror! What abomination! Go on, vile Judas, go to the holy table, go and give death to your God and your Saviour! Let your conscience cry out, only try to stifle its remorse as much as you can. . . . But I am going too far, my brethren. Let us leave these poor blind creatures in their gloom.
I think, brethren, that you would like to know what is the state of the lukewarm soul. Well, this is it. A lukewarm soul is not yet quite dead in the eyes of God because the faith, the hope, and the charity which are its spiritual life are not altogether extinct. But it is a faith without zeal, a hope without resolution, a charity without ardour . . . .
Nothing touches this soul: it hears the word of God, yes, that is true; but often it just bores it. Its possessor hears it with difficulty, more or less by habit, like someone who thinks that he knows enough about it and does enough of what he should.
Any prayers which are a bit long are distasteful to him. This soul is so full of whatever it has just been doing or what it is going to do next, its boredom is so great, that this poor unfortunate thing is almost in agony. It is still alive, but it is not capable of doing anything to gain Heaven . . . .
For the last twenty years this soul has been filled with good intentions without doing anything at all to correct its habits.
It is like someone who is envious of anyone who is on top of the world but who would not deign to lift a foot to try to get there himself. It would not, however, wish to renounce eternal blessings for those of the world. Yet it does not wish either to leave the world or to go to Heaven, and if it can just manage to pass its time without crosses or difficulties, it would never ask to leave this world at all. If you hear someone with such a soul say that life is long and pretty miserable, that is only when everything is not going in accordance with his desires. If God, in order to force such a soul to detach itself from temporal things, sends it any cross or suffering, it is fretful and grieving and abandons itself to grumbles and complaints and often even to a kind of despair. It seems as if it does not want to see that God has sent it these trials for its good, to detach it from this world and to draw it towards Himself. What has it done to deserve these trials? In this state a person thinks in his own mind that there are many others more blameworthy than himself who have not to submit to such trials.
In prosperous times the lukewarm soul does not go so far as to forget God, but neither does it forget itself. It knows very well how to boast about all the means it has employed to achieve its prosperity. It is quite convinced that many others would not have achieved the same success. It loves to repeat that and to hear it repeated, and every time it hears it, it is with fresh pleasure. The individual with the lukewarm soul assumes a gracious air when associating with those who flatter him. But towards those who have not paid him the respect which he believes he has deserved or who have not been grateful for his kindnesses, he maintains an air of frigid indifference and seems to indicate to them that they are ungrateful creatures who do not deserve to receive the good which he has done them . . . .
If I wanted to paint you an exact picture, my brethren, of the state of a soul which lives in tepidity, I should tell you that it is like a tortoise or a snail. It moves only by dragging itself along the ground, and one can see it getting from place to place with great difficulty. The love of God, which it feels deep down in itself, is like a tiny spark of fire hidden under a heap of ashes.
The lukewarm soul comes to the point of being completely indifferent to its own loss. It has nothing left but a love without tenderness, without action, and without energy which sustains it with difficulty in all that is essential for salvation. But for all other means of Grace, it looks upon them as nothing or almost nothing. Alas, my brethren, this poor soul in its tepidity is like someone between two bouts of sleep. It would like to act, but its will has become so softened that it lacks either the force or the courage to accomplish its wishes.
It is true that a Christian who lives in tepidity still regularly-in appearance at least-fulfils his duties. He will indeed get down on his knees every morning to say his prayers. He will go to the Sacraments every year at Easter and even several times during the course of the twelve months. But in all of this there will be such a distaste, so much slackness and so much indifference, so little preparation, so little change in his way of life, that it is easy to see that he is only fulfilling his duties from habit and routine . . . . because this is a feast and he is in the habit of carrying them out at such a time. His Confessions and his Communions are not sacrilegious, if you like, but they are Confessions and Communions which bear no fruit-which, far from making him more perfect and more pleasing to God, only make him more unworthy. As for his prayers, God alone knows what-without, of course, any preparation-he makes of these.
In the morning it is not God who occupies his thoughts, nor the salvation of his poor soul; he is quite taken up with thoughts of work. His mind is so wrapped up in the things of earth that the thought of God has no place in it. He is thinking about what he is going to be doing during the day, where he will be sending his children and his various employees, in what way he will expedite his own work. To say his prayers, he gets down on his knees, undoubtedly, but he does not know what he wants to ask God, nor what he needs, nor even before whom he is kneeling. His careless demeanour shows this very clearly. It is a poor man indeed who, however miserable he is, wants nothing at all and loves his poverty. It is surely a desperately sick person who scorns doctors and remedies and clings to his infirmities.
You can see that this lukewarm soul has no difficulty, on the slightest pretext, in talking during the course of his prayers.
For no reason at all he will abandon them, partly at least, thinking that he will finish them in another moment. Does he want to offer his day to God, to say his Grace? He does all that, but often without thinking of the one who is addressed. He will not even stop working. If the possessor of the lukewarm soul is a man, he will turn his cap or his hat around in his hands as if to see whether it is good or bad, as though he had some idea of selling it. If it is a woman, she will say her prayers while slicing bread into her soup, or putting wood on the fire, or calling out to her children or maid. If you like, such distractions during prayer are not exactly deliberate. People would rather not have them, but because it is necessary to go to so much trouble and expend so much energy to get rid of them, they let them alone and allow them to come as they will.
The lukewarm Christian may not perhaps work on Sunday at tasks which seem to be forbidden to anyone who has even the slightest shred of religion, but doing some sewing, arranging something in the house, driving sheep to the fields during the times for Masses, on the pretext that there is not enough food to give them-all these things will be done without the slightest scruple, and such people will prefer to allow their souls and the souls of their employees to perish rather than endanger their animals. A man will busy himself getting out his tools and his carts and harrows and so on, for the next day; he will fill in a hole or fence a gap; he will cut various lengths of cords and ropes; he will carry out the churns and set them in order. What do you think about all this, my brethren? Is it not, alas, the simple truth?
A lukewarm soul will go to Confession regularly, and even quite frequently. But what kind of Confessions are they? No preparation, no desire to correct faults, or, at the least, a desire so feeble and so small that the slightest difficulty will put a stop to it altogether. The Confessions of such a person are merely repetitions of old ones, which would be a happy state of affairs indeed if there were nothing to add to them. Twenty years ago he was accusing himself of the same things he confesses today, and if he goes to Confession for the next twenty years, he will say the same things. A lukewarm soul will not, if you like, commit the big sins. But some slander or back-biting, a lie, a feeling of hatred, of dislike, of jealousy, a slight touch of deceit or double-dealing-these count for nothing with it. If it is a woman and you do not pay her all the respect which she considers her due, she will, under the guise of pretending that God has been offended, make sure that you realise it; she could say more than that, of course, since it is she herself who has been offended. It is true that such a woman would not stop going to the Sacraments, but her dispositions are worthy of compassion.
On the day when she wants to receive her God, she spends part of the morning thinking of temporal matters. If it is a man, he will be thinking about his deals and his sales. If it is a married woman, she will be thinking about her household and her children. If it is a young girl, her thoughts will be on her clothes.
If it is a boy, he will be dreaming about passing pleasures and so on. The lukewarm soul shuts God up in a n obscure and ugly kind of prison. Its possessor does not crucify Him, but God can find little joy or consolation in his heart.
All his dispositions proclaim that his poor soul is struggling for the breath of life.
After having received Holy Communion, this person will hardly give another thought to God in all the days to follow. His manner of life tells us that he did not know the greatness of the happiness which had been his.
A lukewarm Christian thinks very little upon the state of his poor soul and almost never lets his mind run over the past. If the thought of making any effort to be better crosses his mind at all, he believes that once he has confessed his sins, he ought to be perfectly happy and at peace. He assists at Holy Mass very much as he would at any ordinary activity. He does not think at all seriously of what he is doing and finds no trouble in chatting about all sorts of things while on the way there. Possibly he will not give a single thought to the fact that he is about to participate in the greatest of all the gifts that God, all-powerful as He is, could give us. He does give some thought to the needs of his own soul, yes, but a very small and feeble amount of thought indeed. Frequently he will even present himself before the presence of God without having any idea of what he is going to ask of Him. He has few scruples in cutting out, on the least pretext, the Asperges and the prayers before Mass. During the course of the service, he does not want to go to sleep, of course, and he is even afraid that someone might see him, but he does not do himself any violence all the same. He does not want, of course, to have distractions during prayer or during the Holy Mass, yet when he should put up some little fight against them, he suffers them very patiently, considering the fact that he does not like them. Fast days are reduced to practically nothing, either by advancing the time of the main meal or, under the pretext that Heaven was never taken by famine, by making the collation so abundant that it amounts to a full meal. When he performs good or beneficial actions, his intentions are often very mixed-sometimes it is to please someone, sometimes it is out of compassion, and sometimes it is just to please the world. With such people everything that is not a really serious sin is good enough. They like doing good, being faithful, but they wish that it did not cost them anything or, at least, that it cost very little. They would like to visit the sick, indeed, but it would be more convenient if the sick would come to them. They have something to give away in alms, they know quite well that a certain person has need of help, but they wait until she comes to ask them instead of anticipating her, which would make the kindness so very much more meritorious. We will even say, my brethren, that the person who leads a lukewarm life does not fail to do plenty of good works, to frequent the Sacraments, to assist regularly at all church services, but in all of this one sees only a weak, languishing faith, hope which the slightest trial will upset, a love of God and of neighbour which is without warmth or pleasure. Everything that such a person does is not entirely lost, but it is very nearly so.
See, before God, my brethren, on what side you are. On the side of the sinners, who have abandoned everything and plunge themselves into sin without remorse? On the side of the just souls, who seek but God alone? Or are you of the number of these slack, tepid, and indifferent souls such as we have just been depicting for you? Down which road are you travelling?
Who can dare assure himself that he is neither a great sinner nor a tepid soul but that he is one of the elect? Alas, my brethren, how many seem to be good Christians in the eyes of the world who are really tepid souls in the eyes of God, Who knows our inmost hearts . . . .
Let us ask God with all our hearts, if we are in this state, to give us the grace to get out of it, so that we may take the route that all the saints have taken and arrive at the happiness that they are enjoying. That is what I desire for you . . . .
|
|
|
| Leo XIV Promotes African Bishop Who Thanked Francis for "Updating the Gospel" |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-22-2025, 01:06 PM - Forum: Pope Leo XIV
- No Replies
|
 |
Leo XIV Promotes African Bishop Who Thanked Francis for "Updating the Gospel"
![[Image: i2c7ioeqpioawqaj77snzxhknnyftx4r0s9fyb8?...1761187603]](https://seedus4268.gloriatv.net/storage1/i2c7ioeqpioawqaj77snzxhknnyftx4r0s9fyb8?secure=t8XzkLA6HRgwj5o1wRK0rA&expires=1761187603)
gloria.tv | October 22, 2025
Pope Leo XIV has appointed on October 22 Bishop Alexis Touabli Youlo, 65, as Bishop of the Diocese of San Pedro-en-Côte-d’Ivoire, Ivory Coast.
Bishop Youlo was ordained a priest in 1987. In October 2006, he was appointed the first Bishop of the new diocese of Agboville.
He has served as President of the Episcopal Conference of Côte d’Ivoire and since May 2022 as President of the Regional Episcopal Conference of West Africa (RECOWA). RECOWA comprises 154 Catholic Dioceses spread across 11 Catholic Bishops’ Conferences in 16 countries of Anglophone and Francophone Africa.
As President, Monsignor Youlo has repeatedly pushed synodality (“walking together”) and social priorities.
At an assembly he led in Dakar in May 2025, Bishop Youlo placed “justice and peace” and “a synodal Church in West Africa” at the heart of the meeting.
In recent years, he repeatedly organised inter-faith prayers (pictured left) and interreligious events for peace.
In November 2022, he took part in civil clothes in the 26th edition of National Peace Day in Agboville (pictured right).
In a May 5, 2022 interview with AciAfrica.org, Bishop Youlo said, “We thank God for inspiring Pope Francis to write Fratelli Tutti. I think this document is an updated version of the Gospel.”
|
|
|
| The Catholic Trumpet: Where Art Thou, Bishop Gerardo Zendejas? |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-21-2025, 12:37 PM - Forum: The Catholic Trumpet
- No Replies
|
 |
Where Art Thou, Bishop Gerardo Zendejas?
Bishop Gerardo Zendejas may have once stood with the Catholic Resistance, warning of betrayal and compromise. Today, he remains silent while the faithful are scattered. He has neither corrected error nor defended +Archbishop Lefebvre’s teaching.
Watch Here:
This video highlights:
• Silence in the face of the New Mass and Vatican II compromises.
• Ambiguity defended by Zendejas instead of clear opposition to heresy.
• The dangers of sedevacantism left unchallenged.
• How the now NeoSSPX and other pseudo-Resistance groups fail the faithful. As Pope St. Felix III warned: “Not to oppose error is to approve it; not to defend truth is to suppress it.”
The time for clarity or compromise is now. The warnings of Our Lady are clear. The Church is eclipsed, but her restoration will come through fidelity, penance, and devotion. The faithful remnant must rise and remain steadfast, speaking and acting according to truth, even when others fall silent.
|
|
|
| Feast of Our Lady: Mater Admirabilis - October 20th |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-20-2025, 03:02 PM - Forum: Our Lady
- No Replies
|
 |
Mater Admirabilis / Mother Most Admirable (1844) – 20 October
Taken from here.
Mater Admirabilis is a fresco depicting the Virgin Mary, in the Monastery of the Trinità dei Monti, in Rome.
It was painted by a young French artist, Pauline Perdrau and has been associated with several miracles.
In 1844, a generation after the Society of the Sacred Heart was founded, Pauline Perdrau, a young novice, took it upon herself to produce a fresco of the Virgin Mary on a wall in a recreational area of the convent, Trinità dei Monti in Rome.
As a child, Pauline had had a favourite pink dress, so she chose to paint Mary as a young woman in a rose-coloured dress rather than a matronly Madonna in blue. The lily at Mary’s side represented her purity; the distaff and spindle, her love of work; a book, her dedication to study.
Unfortunately, although Pauline put herself wholeheartedly into her task, her inexperience with the technique of fresco did not produce the beautiful soft painting for which she had hoped. The too vivid colours, had to be hidden behind a drape.
Pope Pius IX, upon visiting the Convent on 20 October 1846, requested that the curtain be removed. Seeing the fresco of our Lady, its colours inexplicably softened, he exclaimed, “Mater Admirabilis!” Miracles soon began with the cure of a missionary Priest who had completely lost the power of speech. Permission was given to offer Mass before the miraculous picture and to celebrate the Feast of Mater Admirabilis on 20 October.
|
|
|
| St. Alphonsus Liguori: Daily Meditations for Nineteenth Week after Pentecost |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-19-2025, 06:40 AM - Forum: Pentecost
- Replies (6)
|
 |
St. Teresa received from God the gift of Faith in so full a measure that she has written in her Life: "The devil never had power to tempt me in any way against the Faith. It even seemed to me that the more impossible, naturally speaking, a truth of Faith was, the more firmly did I believe it, and the more difficult of belief, the more did it inspire me with devotion."
I.
St. Teresa received from God the gift of Faith in so full of measure that she has written in her Life: "The devil never had power to tempt me in any way against the Faith. It even seemed to me that the more impossible, naturally speaking, a truth of Faith was, the more firmly did I believe it, and the more difficult of belief, the more did it inspire me with devotion."
One day she was told she might be denounced to the Holy Office as a heretic. "This made me smile," she writes, "knowing so well that for the things of holy Faith, or for the least of the ceremonies of the Church, I would give my life a thousand times."
This love for the Faith gave her the fortitude, when but seven years of age, to set out from her father's house with her little brother, to go amongst the Moors, in order that she might sacrifice her life for the Faith. Later on in life, such was her conviction of the truth of our Faith, that she felt as if she could convince all the Lutherans and bring them to an acknowledgment of their errors.
In a word, the satisfaction she experienced at seeing herself among the number of the children of the Church was such, that at the hour of her death she could not often enough repeat to herself these words: "After all, I am a child of the Holy Church! After all, I am a child of the Holy Church!"
Let the fruit of this consideration be that of continual thanksgiving, in union with the Saint, to the Lord, for having bestowed upon us the great gift of the Faith, in making us children of the Holy Church, from which so many millions of souls, perhaps less guilty than ourselves, in the sight of Divine justice, remain separated.
My most loving Jesus, Who, although thou didst foresee my ingratitude, hast never ceased to bestow upon me an abundance of graces, above all, the grace of the Faith -- ah, of Thy mercy enkindle such a flame within my heart, that my daily life may be always conformable to my Faith. O Divine, true and only Lover of my soul, when will the day at length arrive on which I shall begin to love Thee with my whole heart? Oh, would to God that today were this day of happiness for me, the day on which I have, in the present Novena, begun to honour Thy dear spouse and my tender advocate, Teresa! Ah! my Redeemer, by the merits of Thy Blood; by the merits of Mary, Thy most holy Mother and by those of Thy beloved Teresa, grant me, I pray Thee, so burning a love for Thee as may make me continually deplore the sins I have committed, and may urge me, henceforth, to study nothing but Thy good pleasure, in order that I may please Thee only, as Thou dost deserve. Amen.
II.
From the wonderful gift of Faith which the Saint possessed arose the great love she bore towards the Most Holy Sacrament, which is preeminently the Mystery of Faith. She used to say that God has conferred upon us a greater grace in giving us the Holy Eucharist than in becoming man; and so, one of the principal virtues the Saint possessed was her special affection towards Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, as she herself revealed after her death. When the Saint heard someone say he wished he lived at the time Jesus was upon earth, she would smile and say: "And what more do we want, having Jesus in the Most Holy Sacrament? Surely, if it was enough, while He was upon earth, to touch His raiment, in order to be healed of infirmities, what will He not do for us now when He is within us in Holy Communion?" "Oh, how sweet it is," she wrote, "to see the Shepherd become a Lamb. He is a Shepherd, because He gives food. He is a Lamb, because He is Himself the food. He is a Shepherd, because He nourishes. He is a Lamb, because He is the nourishment. When, therefore, we pray to Him for our daily bread, we are asking that He, the Shepherd, may be our food and sustenance."
The Divine Lover responded to the love with which this cherished spouse of His desired Him, and with which she disposed herself to receive Him under the sacramental species. As darkness disappears before the sun, so at the moment of Communion the obscurities and troubles of the Saint used to vanish. It then seemed to her that her soul lost all its affections and all its desires, being perfectly united with God and absorbed in Him. Although she was usually pale in consequence of her penances and infirmities, her biographer says, that no sooner had she communicated than her countenance became shining as crystal, ruddy, extremely beautiful, and with such an air of majesty about it, that it was easy to recognize what a Divine Guest she had received into her heart. At those times her virginal body seemed ready to quit the earth, raising itself in the air in the presence of the Sisters.
O Seraphic Saint, who by thy purity and ardent love, were upon earth the delight of thy God -- thou whom He loved so much as one day to tell thee that as Magdalen was His beloved one when He was on earth, so thou wert in the same degree His beloved one now that He is in Heaven -- oh thou dear Saint, whom He treated with such tenderness whether He admonished thee as a Father, or conversed with thee as a Spouse communicating Himself to thee so frequently in Holy Communion and with such abundant outpourings of grace-O Teresa, plead with thy God for me who, alas! am not the object of His delights but the cause of His sufferings by my evil life. Pray to Jesus to pardon me and to give me a new heart, a heart pure and full of Divine love like unto thine own. Amen.
Spiritual Reading
TERESA'S LOVE FOR JESUS IN THE EUCHARIST
The holy mother Teresa never ceased to deplore the injurious treatment that Jesus received in the Sacrament of His love at the hands of heretics. She would complain to God: "Now how, O my Creator, can such tender love as Thine endure that what was instituted with such ardent affection by Thy Son, and the more to please Thee, should be so undervalued that at this day these heretics despise the Most Holy Sacrament? For they rob it of its home by demolishing the Churches. Was it not enough, O my Father, that whilst Jesus lived on earth He had no place to lay His head, without now taking from Him the holy places where He deigns to abide, and whereunto He invites His friends, knowing, as He does, their need of such food for their comfort?"
For twenty-three years she communicated every day, and every time with such fervour and desire, that in order to receive Communion, she would, as she said, willingly have made her way against the spears of a whole army.
One Palm Sunday as she was considering that among all those who at Jerusalem had proclaimed Jesus Christ as the Messias, there was not one to receive Him into his house, she invited Him to come and enter her poor heart, and with this pious thought she went to receive Communion. The affectionate invitation of His beloved was so agreeable to the Divine Spouse, that when she received the Sacred Host it seemed to her that her mouth was filled with warm blood, accompanied with a heavenly sweetness. Then she heard the voice of Jesus saying: "My daughter, it is My will that My Blood should be for your profit: I have shed it in great suffering, and you enjoy it, as you see, with great delights."
With regard, therefore, to this greatest of all gifts that Jesus has bequeathed to us in the Sacrament of the Altar, in leaving Himself, whole and entire, to be our Food, our Companion and our Shepherd, let us practise the excellent instruction that the holy mother once revealed from Heaven to a certain soul: "The inhabitants of Heaven and those of earth should be one and the same in purity and in love: we, in a state of joy; you, in that of suffering. And, what we do in Heaven with the Divine Essence, you ought to do on earth with the Most Holy Sacrament. You will mention this to all my children." Treating of the love and tender devotion that are due to Jesus in the Holy Sacrament, she has again left us in her works the following directions: "Let us act so as not to be at a distance from our Shepherd, nor lose sight of him, because the sheep that keep near their shepherd are always more caressed and better taken care of than others, and because he is always giving them some morsels of his own food. If it happens that the shepherd sleeps, the faithful sheep keeps close beside him, until he awakes, or it will arouse him, and then he lavishes upon it his caresses anew."
St. Philip Neri, that other seraph of love, on seeing Jesus entering his room to be his Viaticum, could not refrain from crying out in a holy transport: "Behold my Love! Behold my Love!" So let us, when we see the King and Spouse of our souls coming to meet us in Holy Communion, cry out and say: Behold my Love! Behold my Love! And we know that God wishes us to give Him this appellation. God is love (1 John iv. 16). He does not wish to be merely called a Lover, but to be Love itself, to make us understand that, as there is no love that does not love, so He, the Divine Goodness, is of His own nature so loving, that He cannot live without loving His creatures.
Evening Meditation
CONFORMITY TO THE WILL OF GOD*
I. EXCELLENCE OF THIS VIRTUE
Our whole perfection consists in loving God Who is in Himself most lovely: Charity is the bond of perfection (Col. iii. 14). But, then, all perfection in the love of God consists in the union of our own with His most holy will. This, indeed, is the principal effect of love, as St. Dionysius the Areopagite observes, "such a union of the wills of those who love as makes them one and the same will." And, therefore, the more united a person is with the Divine will, so much greater will be his love. It is quite true that mortifications, meditations, Communions, and works of charity towards others are pleasing to God. But when is this the case? When they are done in conformity to God's will; for otherwise, not only does He not approve them, but He abominates and punishes them. Take the case of two servants, one of whom labours hard and incessantly all day long, but does everything after his own fashion; while the other may not work as hard, but acts always in obedience to orders. Is it not certain that it is the latter, and not the former, who pleases his master? In what respect can any works of ours tend to the glory of God, where they are not done according to His good pleasure? It is not sacrifices that the Lord desires, says the Prophet to Saul, but obedience to His will: Doth the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the Lord should be obeyed (1 Kings, xv. 22). To refuse to obey is like the crime of idolatry. He who will act according to his own will, and independently of God's, commits a kind of idolatry; since instead of worshipping the Divine will, he, in a certain sense, worships his own.
II.
The greatest glory, then, that we can give to God is the fulfilment of His holy will in everything. This is what our Redeemer, Whose purpose in coming upon earth was the establishment of the glory of God, principally came to teach by His example. See how Jesus addresses His Eternal Father: Sacrifice and oblation, thou wouldst not; but a body thou hast fitted to me ... then said I: Behold, I come -- that I should do thy will, O God (Heb. x. 5). Thou hast refused to accept the victims which mankind have offered Thee. It is Thy will that I should sacrifice to Thee the body which Thou hast given Me; lo, I am ready to perform Thy will! And hence it is that Jesus so often declares He had come upon earth not to fulfil His own, but His Father's will only: I came down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him that sent me (Jo. vi. 38). And on this account Jesus wished that the world might know the love He bore His Father, from the obedience to His will which He manifested in sacrificing Himself upon the Cross for the salvation of mankind; just as He said Himself in the Garden when going forth to meet His enemies who had come to take Him and lead Him away to death: That the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father hath given me commandment, so do I; Arise, let ye go hence! (Jo. xiv. 31). And for this reason, too, He said He would recognize as His very own brother him who acted according to the Divine will: Whosoever shall do the will of my Father, he is my brother (Matt. xii. 50).
*This is a golden treatise that seems rather to have been inspired from Heaven than to have emanated from the human mind. The holy author himself, St. Alphonsus, used often to read it. He constantly practised the wise maxims it contains and always endeavoured to inculcate its practice on others. He was accustomed to say: "The Saints became Saints because they always remained united to the will of God." When the Saint's eyesight began to fail, him, he took care to have this little treatise read to him. -- ED.
|
|
|
|