| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 532 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 529 Guest(s) Bing, Google, Yandex
|
|
|
| Pope Leo says ‘no one possesses the whole truth’ in Sunday sermon |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-28-2025, 09:51 AM - Forum: Pope Leo XIV
- Replies (1)
|
 |
The irony isn't lost upon us that on the traditional Feast of Christ the King, the last Sunday of October, changed in the new Conciliar religion to the 'Thirteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time,' and during the Jubilee Mass of the Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies, the Pope implicitly denies Our Lord's Kingship by relegating Him to one among many possessing the true religion...
Pope Leo says ‘no one possesses the whole truth’ in Sunday sermon
Although no created man possesses the fullness of truth, the Church has a duty to guard and proclaim the infallible truths of the faith.
Pope Leo XIV delivers the Regina Caeli prayer in St. Peter's Square
Franco Origlia/Getty Images
Oct 27, 2025
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Leo XIV has said that “no one possesses the whole truth” and “no one is excluded” from the Church in his most recent Sunday sermon.
In his homily delivered at the Jubilee Mass of the Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies on October 26, Leo made remarks that could be interpreted as relativistic regarding the Catholic Church’s proclamation of the one true faith.
“The supreme rule in the Church is love. No one is called to dominate; all are called to serve,” the Roman Pontiff said. “No one should impose his or her own ideas; we must all listen to one another. No one is excluded; we are all called to participate.”
“No one possesses the whole truth; we must all humbly seek it and seek it together,” he stated.
He later reiterated this point, saying, “Being a synodal Church means recognizing that truth is not possessed, but sought together, allowing ourselves to be guided by a restless heart in love with Love.”
Leo stressed the importance of the Church being “synodal,” a vague term often used by his predecessor, Pope Francis.
“The synodal teams and participatory bodies are an image of this Church that lives in communion,” he noted.
READ: Pope Leo holds service with Charles III, head of church that canceled Catholicism for centuries
He said, “[W]e must dream of and build a more humble Church; a Church that does not stand upright like the Pharisee, triumphant and inflated with pride, but bends down to wash the feet of humanity; a Church that does not judge as the Pharisee does the tax collector, but becomes a welcoming place for all; a Church that does not close in on itself, but remains attentive to God so that it can similarly listen to everyone.”
“Let us commit ourselves to building a Church that is entirely synodal, ministerial and attracted to Christ and therefore committed to serving the world,” he concluded.
While it is true that no created man possesses the fullness of truth, the Catholic Church, as the Mystical Body of Christ guided by the Holy Spirit, has always maintained that it is the guardian of the deposit of faith, which is the truth revealed by God.
Pope Leo’s comments are ambiguous and may be interpreted as relativistic, since he failed to make the distinction between individual members of the Church being fallible in their understanding of truth and the Church, as the Mystical Body of Christ, guarding and proclaiming the one true faith.
Sacred Scripture states that “the Church of the living God” is “the pillar and bulwark of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15)
Regarding the Church’s authority to proclaim the truth, the 1992 Catechism of the Catholic Church states: “The Church’s Magisterium exercises the authority it holds from Christ to the fullest extent when it defines dogmas, that is, when it proposes, in a form obliging the Christian people to an irrevocable adherence of faith, truths contained in divine Revelation or also when it proposes, in a definitive way, truths having a necessary connection with these.” (CCC 88)
Regarding the Pope’s comment that “no one is excluded” from the Church, Catholic author and commentator Erick Ybarra responded on X:
“Are Jesus and the Apostles welcome? Do their commands have any value? In particular, about not even eating with Christians who live in outward contradiction to the commands of Christ and/or those who obstinately contradict the dogmas of Tradition? (1 Cor 5:1-13; 2 John 1:10) and treating the impenitent ‘faithful’ as heathen and tax collectors? (Mathew 18)” [sic]
“I think Catholic liberals would vomit at the teaching of Jesus and the Church of the Apostles,” Ybarra continued. “They can barely take a Christianity with any testosterone to begin with. They are more interested in the Church that appeals to the pleasure and honor of man than God.”
|
|
|
| WHO & EU Launch AI to Control Online ‘Misinformation’ |
|
Posted by: Stone - 10-25-2025, 08:48 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
 |
WHO & EU Launch AI to Control Online ‘Misinformation’
Cindy Harper via TIA | October 24, 2025
The World Health Organization has introduced a major overhaul of its global monitoring network, unveiling an AI-powered platform that tracks online conversations and media activity in real time.
Known as Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources 2.0 (EIOS), the system is being presented as a new step in “pandemic preparedness,” but its reach extends well beyond disease surveillance.
The upgrade is part of a growing merger between health monitoring, digital tracking, and centralized information control.
The European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) launches the EIOS new version
Developed with the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), the new version of EIOS is designed to scan the internet for signals of emerging health threats.
According to the WHO, it now automatically analyzes social media posts, websites, and other public sources to detect possible outbreaks.
While this is described as a tool for early warning, it effectively allows a global health authority to observe the world’s digital conversations under the banner of safety.
The WHO’s EIOS Collaboration page indicates that partners are also exploring projects such as “News Article Credibility Detection” and “Misinformation Classification Systems.”
These initiatives suggest a growing interest in shaping how information is categorized and filtered.
The latter effort appears linked to the JRC’s “Misinfo Classifier,” released in 2020, which the JRC described as an AI program that detects “fake news” by analyzing the tone and intensity of language in articles.
The organization claimed the tool achieved an 80% success rate and stated that “this is comparable to the state of the art right now.”
At the time, the JRC said the classifier was already in use by the European Commission and European Parliament, and that it would soon be shared with professional fact-checking organizations.
The existence of that project highlights how data analysis and information control are being integrated into public health infrastructure.
The head of WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, relies on Xi Jinping, president of Communist China
The WHO reports that EIOS now operates in more than 110 countries and collaborates with over 30 organizations, including national governments and the European Commission. The platform is being offered “free of charge” to eligible users, along with training materials and support.
This approach ties national monitoring systems directly into a WHO-managed network that continuously gathers and processes global data.
The WHO’s concept of “social listening” sheds more light on this strategy. It defines social listening as “the process of listening to and analyzing conversations and narratives” to understand people’s “attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, and intentions.”
In practical terms, this means that the organization is not only collecting data about disease but also analyzing how citizens think and communicate online.
In its October 13 announcement, the WHO described EIOS 2.0 as “more open, more agile and more inclusive.”
However, under that language lies an expanding surveillance framework that uses artificial intelligence to interpret global social behavior.
A system supposedly for improving health security could easily function as a tool for monitoring public opinion and online expression.
This initiative combines artificial intelligence, government cooperation, and social media tracking under the label of global health security. It represents a change from traditional disease control toward the ongoing analysis of public communication, where algorithms determine which discussions appear “relevant” or “misleading.”
This is something that the WHO has been looking at implementing for some time.
For countries choosing to adopt EIOS, dependence on WHO data and analysis may come at the cost of digital independence.
Under the justification of protecting public health, the WHO is establishing an always-on digital network that watches, classifies, and evaluates global discourse, quietly redefining what it means to manage health and information in the same breath.
This article was published by Reclaim the Net on October 19, 2025, under the title “WHO and European Commission Launch AI System to Monitor Social Media and Online “Misinformation” in Real Time"
|
|
|
|